South China Sea–DisputesNo Easy Solution In Sight

Again this week ongoing territorial disputes involving the South China Sea have come to the forefront. China and Viet Nam are squaring off over China’s oil drilling in territory that it considers its own. Naturally China doesn’t see it this way. The Philippines also has an ongoing dispute with China over boundaries. In all, seven states lay claim to territory in the area. These include China, Brunei, the Philippines, Taiwan, Indonesia, Malaysia and Viet Nam. Current tensions just bring more attention to this region. The May 10-11 ASEAN summit in Myanmar will address this key issue. The question is: can a solution to this problem be found among the parties involved? Can they settle their differences in a peaceable manner or will it be necessary to get outside help, the United Nations for example. Please log in and give us your thoughts on this matter. 

Photo: SCS, Nantau, stratman2 via flickr

ASEAN Summit May 10-11, Nay Pyi Taw, Myanmar

 

Myanmar is center stage for the 2014 ASEAN Summit to be held in its capital Nay Pyi Taw on May 10th and 11th. Representatives from 10 ASEAN countries will converge on the capital to discuss a range of issues including the ASEAN Charter and the planned ASEAN Economic Community (AEC) scheduled for a 2015 launch. The proposed AEC will reduce barriers on trade and movement of labor within the region. A key issue before the members will be the ongoing maritime disputes centering on the South China Sea. 

The Myanmar Times reported on May 9 that Myanmar is set to announce the Nay Pyi Taw Declaration to urge increased cooperation ahead of the 2015 start of the AEC. Myanmar, as 2014 ASEAN chair is responsible to make sure that all members are up to speed before 2015.

The May 10-11 meeting is the first major meeting Myanmar is holding as ASEAN chair. According to the ASEAN website: “Political, economic and administrative reforms in Myanmar since 2011 have made it possible for Myanmar to play a more active roe in regional and international affairs in accordance with its foreign policy objectives…”

Empires Wax And Wane…

                “Empires wax and wane; states cleave asunder and coalesce.” 

This is the opening line of China’s great 14th century novel, The Romance of the Three Kingdoms ( San Kuo Chi Yen-i). And while it might have been an accurate description of the Three Kingdoms period, it might also be a real template to examine our own era.  There are many examples of this process since the close of WWII. The most dramatic would be Russia’s hegemony over eastern Europe in the 1940s and 1950s, and then the gradual dissolution of that hegemony with the defection of Yugoslavia, and finally the dramatic disintegration of the Soviet Union and the fall of the Berlin Wall. In the 1990s we saw the breakup of Yugoslavia and the creation of new ethnic-based states. In more recent times in the Middle East and North Africa governments have fallen and tribal and ethnic loyalties have become the basis for nation states. And now we have Ukraine apparently about to “cleave asunder” over ethnic lines. So this week’s question is this: Do you agree that the breakup of states is inevitable, or do you think that national stability is a possibility? Log in and post your thoughts.

Liaoning & Osprey-Icons of National Intent?

U142P5029T2D523115F28DT20121105104830.jpg                                                

                     by David Parmer

Are weapons systems just the best  hi-tech engines of war that a country can field at a given time, or can they give us a clear insight into the way a nation sees its future political-military role regionally or globally?

After landing in Qingdao on April 7, U.S. Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel was treated to a rare look at China’s first aircraft carrier, the Liaoning. Hagel was the first foreign visitor to set foot on the vessel. He reportedly toured the ship and chatted informally with crew members. After the visit the media speculated on the deeper meaning of the visit. Many suggested that it showed a willingness to engage in greater transparency on the Chinese side. Whatever the reason for the visit, the ship itself is no real mystery.

Launched in Russia in 1990, she was bought by the PRC from Ukraine and towed ( in an event-filled voyage) to Dalian, China in 1990. The cover story of the hull being used as a floating casino was dispensed with, and refitting began. The ship was re-named the Liaoning in honor of the province in which the refitting took place. It was later berthed at Qingdao in Shandong province. On September 25, 2012 the Liaoning was commissioned as a PLA Navy aircraft carrier. At the time of Secretary Hagel’s visit, the U.S. Department of Defense News reported that the Liaoning featured three launch stations for jets, and had a crew of 1500 sailors ( 90 females), 1/6 being officers. The Liaoning reported will accommodate 30, Chinese-built J-15 fighters. Several sea trials have already taken place since the 2012 commissioning.

 

3222742666.jpg                                                      (V-22 Osprey-U.S. Defense)

The V-22 Osprey is a tilt-rotor aircraft with both airplane and helicopter capabilities. It can perform both short takeoff and landings (STOL) and vertical takeoffs and landings (VTOL). It was jointly developed by Bell Helicopter and Boeing Rotorcraft Systems. According to Boeing, it can carry 24 combat-ready troops or 20,000 pounds of cargo. It has a range of 600nm and a maximum cruising speed of 280 knots. The Osprey has mid-air refueling capabilities as well.

The program that led to the development of the Osprey began in 1981, with the first flights in 1989. The U.S. Marines began operating the aircraft in 2007. Currently the Marines and  U.S. Air Force operate more than 200 Osprey. Since its introduction, it has seen combat duty in Iraq and Afghanistan. 

Accidents plagued the Osprey, and there has been a lingering doubt about its reliability despite the fact that, according to Boeing, it has “the lowest Class A mishap rate of any tactical rotorcraft in the Marine Corps during the past decade.” (Boeing.com) This was partly the cause of strong local opposition in April-June 2012 to the deployment of the Osprey to Futenma in Okinawa, Japan. Despite the opposition the aircraft was deployed in July 2012. In June 2013 during operation Dawn Blitz off the coast of California, Osprey were landed on Japan Maritime SDF vessels Shimokita and Hyuga. Osprey reportedly cost $70million each, and have an operating cost of $10,000/hour.

What can we infer from the deployment in the region of these two weapons systems? In the case of the Liaoning, with the commissioning of the ship China joined the aircraft carrier club, an exclusive group of 11 members. The U.S. leads the way with 11 carriers, with most other members having one or two at most. Aircraft carriers enable countries to project power well beyond their nautical boundaries. So is the purpose of buying, refitting, commissioning and operating the Liaoning to send out a state-of-the-art aircraft carrier? Probably not. But if a country is intent on building a naval air arm, it has to start somewhere, and the Liaoning is “somewhere.” Even if China could deploy the flotilla of ships necessary to service and protect the Liaoning, it would be no match for a U.S. carrier. The United States has 70-80 years experience with carrier-based naval aviation, China has a year and a half. Japan too, has vast experience with carrier-based naval aviation. Time magazine reports that China is now working on a second and home-made carrier, with four planned by 2020. So what is the Liaoning? It would be safe to say that it is at least two things: a symbol of China’s yet-to-peak rise to major regional and world power, and a floating university for the PLA Navy’s carrier-based fleet.

 And what does the deployment of the V-22 Osprey in Japan say about Japanese and U.S. policy for the near future?  Probably a lot. The Osprey which caused so much opposition among the Japanese public, might be the very thing that will significantly add to their security. Noted above were the landing of Osprey on Japanese naval vessels during military exercises off California in June 2013. During his recent ( April 2014) visit to Japan, U.S. president Barack Obama made it clear that the U.S. was firm in its commitments to Japan’s defense, including the Senkaku/Diaoyu islands now in dispute between Japan and China. Some strategists suggest that if military action takes place in the islands, it will be short and violent. With the capabilities of the V-22 Osprey, the U.S. could place boots on the ground quickly and in number, or could ferry Japanese SDF troops to Japan naval ships or to landing zones in the islands. The Osprey enables the U.S. and Japan to make a timely and powerful response to any land/sea provocation in the region.

Two weapon systems headed for an inevitable confrontation with the other side’s assets? Not necessarily. The Cold War showed that heavily armed adversaries could face off without major incident for extended periods. But both systems clearly signal readable national intent of the nations involved, and bear close watching in the future.

  PDF on Boeing web page: http://www.boeing.com/boeing/rotorcraft/military/v22/

Liaoning Photo: PLA Navy

 All information on this post is freely available from non-classified web sources.

 

 

 

 

 

Obama: Senkaku Islands Covered by Treaty

At the start of his Asian trip U.S. President Barack Obama clearly stated that the Senkaku Islands as they are known in Japan come under the provisions of the U.S.-Japan defense treaty. At the same time Mr. Obama stated that he hoped the issue between Japan and China over the disputed islands could be settled in an amicable manner. While Mr. Obama says no line has been drawn, what he has said means the U.S. would come to the aid of Japan in the event of any Chinese military action with regard to the Senkaku Islands. (Known as the Diaoyu in China). We now approach mid-year 2014.  The question is what will happen? How will this play out? Will tensions rise this year, will there be incidents in the disputed islands? Log in and give us your opinion. 

ASEAN Transboundry Haze Problem-Good Intentions, But Slow Progress.

indonesia_tmo_2013170.jpg

                        (NASA Satellite Image 2013)

ASEAN Environmental ministers from Singapore, Brunei, Thailand, Indonesia and Malaysia met in Brunei on April 2 to discuss ongoing efforts to counter transboundry haze.This was the 16th Meeting of the Sub-Regional Ministerial Steering Committee (MSC) on Transboundry Haze Pollution.The ministers noted the unfavorable conditions for 2014 brought about by below-average rainfall. This condition is likely to persist until October 2014. 

 On the positive side the ministers commended Indonesia for its efforts in implementing its Plan of Action (POA) dealing with transboundry haze. They also commended Indonesia for its efforts to expedite the process of ratification of the ASEAN Agreement on Transboundry Haze. In addition the ministers provided guidance on implementation of MSC activities to include:

  • monitoring
  • fire prevention
  • establishing a Task Force to deal with fire suppression

 ASEAN has been dealing with the Transboundry Haze problem since 1997 when it formed the Regional Haze Action Plan (RHAP) to deal with prevention, monitoring and mitigation. Malaysia was tasked with taking the lead in prevention, Indonesia with mitigation and Singapore with monitoring. The RHAP lead to the ASEAN Agreement on Transboundry Haze Pollution that was adopted in 2002 and entered into force in 2003.

 Haze is defined as dust, smoke and dry particles in the atmosphere that distort clarity and limit visibility. In quantity, haze can be considered another form of pollution which degrades air quality and can lead to serious short and long term harm for human health.

The ASEAN area’s recent problems arise from a combination of dry weather that encourages the development of wildfires, and the clearing of land for commercial purposes. Traditional slash and burn methods of agriculture also contribute to a lesser degree.

While the 16th MSC’s meeting noted ongoing progress in dealing with the problem, the most worrying part of its statement is the prognosis for the continuation of dry conditions for the year 2014 which could lead to the formulation of a myriad on hotspots, sending smoke and particles into the atmosphere and threatening the region even further.

16th MSC Cross Border Meeting Final Media Release: http://app.mewr.gov.sg/web/contents/contents.aspx?contid=1959

 

 

 

 

Report On A Trip To The Korean DMZ

RG21 Researcher and global strategist Philippe Valdois recently made a trip to the DMZ seperating North and South Korea. Here are some of his thoughts on what he experienced. ED.

No other place on Earth can compare with the Korean Demilitarized Zone or DMZ for the weight of history it carries and as a place of unresolved animosities.

 I recently was offered the chance to visit part of the long gone village of Panmunjom, now the Joint Security Area, as a guest of the United Nations Command. Situated inside the DMZ, a strip of land 4 km wide and 250 km long separating North and South Korea, it has been the site of all negotiations between the 2 countries since the signing of the Armistice Agreement, on July 27, 1953, when each side agreed to move back their troops back 2,000 meters from the front line. It is also the most militarized border in the world. The line running in the center of the DMZ, the Military Demarcation Line, also goes through Panmunjom and in particular down the middle of the conference tables inside the buildings. When the main conference building is unoccupied, visitors have the possibility to stand on the North-Korean side of the table. Before that they have to be briefed and to sign a Visitors Declaration (UNC REG 551-5) warning that “The visit to the Joint Security Area at Panmunjom will entail entry into a hostile area and possibility of injury or death as a direct result of enemy action.”

 This is not in fact a trivial matter. Since the mid-60s’, many incidents have occurred in the DMZ resulting in deaths, including some inside the JSA.  The most famous one is the so-called axe murder incident, in 1976, when North Korean soldiers attacked members of a work party trimming a tree blocking the line of sight from a checkpoint situated at the entrance of the Bridge of No Return (where the return of prisoners of war had taken place decades before). Two unarmed US officers were murdered and the incident was filmed. Now a sobering monument marks the site where the tree originally stood.

The second major incident happened in 1984 when a Soviet defector ran across the MDL. Four people were killed in the resulting exchange of fire.

 It is however necessary to note than if, for the most part, incursions by the North-Korean agents across the DMZ, and the discovery of four tunnels having certainly be dug by North Korea to facilitate an invasion, have made the news, the North had also to contend with a number of raids and sabotage operations by South-Korean forces. Partly declassified documents such as this one http://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76ve12/d286 show that such actions have taken place. Those operations, few of them having been made public, could only antagonize an already paranoiac regime.

 I came out of this visit and another to the War Memorial of Korea, convinced that it might take decades for trust to be built between the two sides. Manufactured or not, fear is a day-to-day reality for the people of South Korea. It is evident that with the present regime in North-Korea, peace and unification will not happen, but it is also clear that from a geopolitical perspective, support to a regime which has done so little for its people can only make this situation worse and encourage North-Korea to isolate itself.

 

Notes On A Visit To China (3)

Bill Lee

 From March 25 to 30, I made another short visit to China — this time to Shenyang in northeastern China and Beijing. The icy relations between Japan and South Korea began to thaw slightly when Prime Minister Shinzo Abe and South Korean President Park Geun-hye met together with President Barack Obama in Geneva at the Nuclear Security Summit at his urging. Prime Minister Abe made a statesmanlike gesture by greeting President Park in Korean, but Abe still sends mixed signals on the sex slave and other issues, and Park appears intent on proving to her constituency in South Korea that she is not pro-Japan, as her father was. There was also a resumption of official talks between Japan and North Korea after a long hiatus. President Xi Jinping was in Europe for a grand tour, grabbing headlines in the China media for enhancing China’s global presence, while at home unprecedented corruption cases were building against very high-level former and current Chinese party officials.

                                                                          Shenyang

The infamous Mukden Incident, when the Japanese Imperial Army allegedly blew up part of a railway as a pretext for invading Manchuria, occurred near Shenyang, then called Mukden. A large memorial marks the spot, with the date of the Incident, September 18, 1931, etched deeply and dramatically in the memorial wall. In Shenyang last month, Japanese and North Korean officials met to discuss the abduction issue, which Japan keenly wishes to resolve, but the negotiations are seen as creating a possible rift between Japan and its partner countries the United States and South Korea. Shenyang is also fairly close to North Korea, and a noticeable Korean presence exists in the city. For many observers of North Korea, a Hamletian dilemma grips them as they question whether to engage or not to engage the DPRK. The official US line is that North Korea should not be engaged, considering their supposed reneging on past agreements that has made the United States conclude that it “would not buy this horse for a third time” (then Defense Secretary Robert Gates), unless they agree to negotiate an end to their nuclear program. In an article in NK News, B.R. Meyers says, “No tour group [to Pyongyang] is complete without at least one suck-up.” A suck-up is one who bows to the statue of Kim Il Sung, as used to be required a number of years ago, apologizes for US actions against the DPRK, or otherwise tries to engage North Korea. In the US State Department, being labeled an “engager” of the DPRK is probably a kiss-of-death career-wise. Meyers likens engagers to the foreign visitors to the 1936 Berlin Olympics who went home “with a better view of Hitler than before,” or as Neville Chamberlains. Engagement is seen as propping up the status quo; isolation or boycotts are the answer. Certainly boycotting South Africa helped to dismantle apartheid, but the problem is that North Korea is already isolated; further isolating it will likely have no effect if China continues its infusions of aid.

 

Articulate North Koreans can make a strong case for engagement. Some “officials” can become quite expansive, but not unguarded, in expressing themselves, especially if they feel some bond of trust with their interlocutors. When asked about Dennis Rodman’s recent visit to the DPRK, one official said, with some embarrassment, “Anyway, he is gone and that is over.” On the current situation in the DPRK, one immediately said that they had “gotten rid of” Jang Song Thaek because he had “mismanaged” the economy, only wanting to build hotel resorts, and promote himself. One wonders how closely associated Jang was with the newly built luxury ski resort in North Korea. Did sour business disputes precipitate Jang’s fall, as the main South Korean intelligence agency claims?  Jang wanted to open up the country to gain foreign currency, and a ski resort would fit that bill. But on the other hand, Kim Jong Un was seen touring the facility, clearly enjoying himself and deeming it “at the center of the world’s attention.” One can only speculate; that is the nature of the game.

 North Koreans are also grateful to George W. Bush. Because of his administration’s veiled threat to destroy North Korea, the North Koreans felt justified in developing their nuclear weapons for protection. They are more ambivalent about somebody like Bill Clinton. North Korea also believes the United States is using North Korea as the “bad boy” in Asia to explain its presence there and “justify its arms buildup.” Apparently, North Korea would negotiate with the United States on two conditions: the signing of a peace treaty and compensation to North Korea for “Cold War debts.” One North Korean said, perhaps straining credulity, that North Korea “wants to become like Switzerland” and could become a buffer between the United States and China. Could North Korea become America’s friend? Why not, say the North Koreans. The United States now has friendly relations with Vietnam, its former enemy (not to mention Japan). A final bit of North Korean Yin/Yang wisdom: “Don’t make friends; recognize them,” and “Never accept anything; but don’t refuse anything.”

 We saw some main must-see sights in Shenyang. The former residence of Zhang Zuolin and Zhang Xueliang is an interesting compound filled with period receptions rooms, offices, and houses and bedrooms for the various wives of the two warlords of Manchuria. Zhang Zuolin, the father, was assassinated by the Japanese to allow his then opium-addicted son, Xueliang, to take power because they thought he would be more malleable. But that didn’t turn out to be the case as Xueliang transformed himself into a fervent patriot, and even kidnapped Chiang Kai-shek in 1936 — the Xian Incident — to get him to join forces with the Communists to drive out the Japanese invaders. He was later exiled to Taiwan and ended up in Honolulu, where he lived to 100. Legend has it that Xueliang flipped coins, which are lovingly preserved, to decide whether to assassinate two officials considered too pro-Japan. The two officials lost the toss.

 In Shenyang, one must of course visit the Imperial Palace, a vast complex and the only existing royal palace in China other than the Forbidden City. Like the palace complex in Beijing, the Shenyang Imperial Palace is meant to impress, which it grandly does with its sweeping spaces, high walls, and imposing buildings. Shenyang’s air was quite polluted so it was a welcome respite to go to Beiling Park, where the Zhaoling Tomb is located. The Tomb is a vast area, divided into three parts, and filled with pine trees, a moat, gates, and pavilions, it offers a tranquil refuge from the city. At the northern end of the park is the Underground Palace, the tomb of the Emperor and his wife, which sits under the Treasure Top, a man-made hill, which one walks around along the “crescent” path. Of discordant interest was the presence of two cosplay girls, in full anime regalia, being photographed by a pack of men with expensive cameras.


RG21-Shenyang.jpg           Treasure Top at the Zhaoling Tomb. Note the solitary tree at the top of the mound.


 Food in northeastern China is hearty, with meat stews, pork “tempura” – razor-thin slices of pork fried in batter — and the delectable pan-fried crepes stuffed with Chinese chives and shredded shrimp.

Going to Beijing by high-speed train was worthwhile, if nothing more than to compare the ride with the journey from Beijing to Shanghai. The train for the latter trip is usually filled with businesspeople, who tend to be quieter, thinking about their business deals. But the trip from Shenyang appears to bring the northerners to Beijing, which makes for a more raucous and vivid journey. One tip: buy a box lunch in the dining car early-on because they sell out fast and only frozen lunches are left.

 Among other places in Beijing, we walked around the campus of Renmin University, where it was interesting to see the students reciting English out-loud repeatedly, which is why Chinese students are better than Japanese students at English, ate chocolate at Godiva’s Beijing flagship store, enjoyed a massage with a young woman stepping on your back, and strolled around the Houhai district, where a lot of bars — some featuring eye-catching pole dancers near the entrance to draw you in — cafes, and “live” houses are located.

 I also realized why so many Chinese people want to shop in Japan, the States, or Europe. It’s not because the goods are necessarily better there; they’re cheaper. I wanted to buy some carry-on luggage, thinking it might be cheaper, but found that in the up-scale department stores, the luggage was about three times more expensive than what I could get in the US, granted, though, it was better quality. Income disparities notwithstanding, it’s great to be the second biggest economy in the world.

                                                                     RG21-Amy-1.jpg

                                                              ShaoMing Ou, RG21 Publisher

Is e-commerce for you, or not?

These days a large portion of what is bought and sold all over the globe is done electronically. While so-called bricks and mortar stores probably will not disappear completely, more and more of their business is lost to online e-commerce. Shopping online is clearly here to stay. But is it for you? Many people prefer to shop (at least initially) in a traditional store, to see and feel the goods and to interact with the seller. Others are quite content to shop and pay electronically. So what is your opinion? Which do you prefer, shopping online, or shopping in person? Or both? Please post your comments once you have logged in.

 

 

China Internet: Who’s On First?

0013729e4ad909f3586d32.jpg                          ( Photo: China Daily)

                             by David Parmer

An old expression from American baseball is: You can’t tell the players without a scorecard.This means you can’t understand a situation until you have some concrete information. This concept clearly applies to the Internet in China. It is hard to easily describe the vibrancy, the fluidity, the size and scope of China’s Internet. Not only are there a multitude of players, but positions are always changing. Reports rate the players in search, e-commerce or social media, but just a few months later, the data is obsolete. Companies jockey for position, and players rise and fall in ranking. Try to find out who has the biggest market share in the search category, for example, and you will probably come up with Baidu, but then the second to fifth tier search companies seem to be always changing in terms of rank and users depending on who is reporting, and who is counting. The Chinese Internet has about 591 million users, this seems to be the agreed-upon figure, after that all bets are off.

 Search

Baidu        50% to 60%

Qihu (360) 20% to 25%

Sogu         10% to 12%

Google      1.3% to 1.6%

In March 2014 a government backed search engine ChinaSo was launched with the backing of Xinhua and China Mobile. Most analysts have low expectations for this new service.

 e-Commerce

Chinese e-commerce is a two- tier system with B2C (Business to Customer) and C2C (Customer to Customer) models in place. The leaders are:

 B2C

TMall (Alibaba)      50%

Jindong (Tencent)  17%

 C2C

Taobao (Alibaba)

PaiPai   (Tencent)

 Figures for B2C sales were $25.6 billion, and a whopping $71 billion for C2C. Of interest in the e-commerce segment is a reported migration of customers from C2C digital market places to B2C sites. Reasons given are that customers are tired of shoddy goods and are looking to more vendor reliability.

Social Media

In social media the Alibaba vs Tencent model continues. eModeration reports that 91% of Chinese Internet users have a social media account. The numbers for early 2014 look like this:

 QZone (Tencent)               712M users

Tencent Weibo                  507 M users

Sina Weibo                        500 M users

We Chat (QQ)                   300 M users

Pengyou                            259 M users

As mid-year 2014 approaches, it looks like his year will be another dynamic year for China’s Internet. And with the economy officially shifting to a domestic consumption model, the non-stop development, expansion and dynamism of China’s Internet can only continue to grow.

 (Data: eModeration/Tech in Asia)