Yasukuni Shrine 70 Years After WWII

640px-Yasukuni_Shrine_201005.jpg

                                   Yasukuni Shrine ( Photo: Wiiii Wikipedia)

Summer is here once again, and in Japan, the issue of government officials visiting Yasukuni Shrine in Tokyo’s Chiyoda ward will soon again be in the news. The end of WWII is remembered every August in Japan, and delegations of government officials including cabinet officers go to Yasukuni Shrine to pay their respects to the war dead. The controversy about these visits centers around objections by China and Korea that “Class A” war criminals are enshrined at Yasukuni, and that such visits are not appropriate given the actions of such people during WWII.

 This controversy seems to have no solution. However, this year being the 70th anniversary of the end of WWII, surely the issue will take on added significance. China plans to hold a huge ceremony to commemorate the end of hostilities just weeks after the late summer visits to Yasukuni. Also, there is always the possibility of the simmering Senkaku/Diaoyu dispute boiling up again due to “provocative” actions by the parties involved. So it could be a very hot summer indeed politically. What are your thoughts on this issue? Please log in and let us know.

 

 

Myanmar’s Hot Mobile Phone Sector Key To Change

Handset23.jpg                    ( Photo:Telenor Website Myanmar)

                                       by David Parmer

If you are looking toward politics as the driving force for change in Myanmar, you are probably looking in the wrong direction. For technology, not politics, is transforming what was formerly one of the world’s most reclusive countries. And the leading agent of  technological change is the mobile phone. Myanmar’s mobile phone revolution is letting the country bypass the personal computer phase of development and go directly to handset and tablet.

 The Nikkei Asia Review reported that there were 10.7 million mobile subscribers by the end of September 2014, up 87% from the end of 2013. The mobile penetration rate stands at 20%, with the government predicting 80% 3G penetration by 2016. Prices for SIM cards have plummeted and competition for subscribers is fierce.

Since the lifting of sanctions in 2013 two foreign firms have been allowed to enter the Myanmar market. They are Ooredoo from Qatar, and Telenor Group from Norway. Both companies have experience is emerging markets, and both are off to a good start. Competition between the two firms is intense, with Telenor taking the lead in number of subscribers causing Ooredoo to find a new Myanmar CEO to head up operations in 2015.

 Forbes magazine lists Myanmar as one of the fastest growing economies in the world. Years of military rule and isolation have left the country with a stunted infrastructure for its mostly-agricultural economy. Infrastructure is not the only drawback in doing business in Myanmar, a lack of trained, tech-savvy bi-lingual staff is also a challenge. And as for e-commerce, Tech In Asia reports that there is both a lack of vendors and a lack of logistics ability to handle a vibrant e-commerce sector.

 So far, the new Myanmar is an Android nation with estimates of the number of Android users being anywhere from 75-95% of total users. Also, Shenzen-based Huawei dominates the handset market, with Samsung coming in second. For those who are interested in predicting trends in Myanmar, technology might be a better focus than politics, because in the world of hyper-tech, politics is yesterday’s news.

 Forbes The Rebirth of Burma

http://www.forbes.com/sites/forbesinternational/2015/01/09/the-rebirth-of-burma/

 

 

Job-fair.png

Iran Nuclear Talks – What the World Needs Now

18073351520_835a84548d_z.jpg   U.S. Sec. of State Kerry and Iran FM Zarif 30 May 2015

                          ( Photo: U.S. State via flickr)

The Iran nuclear talks resumed on Saturday, May 30 in Geneva with less than a month to go to the deadline of June 30 for the completion of a deal. The P5+1 talks have made steady progress, but the question is can they hit the target deadline? There seems to be two sticking points, one, the time-frame for lifting sanctions, and the other inspection of Iranian nuclear facilities, specifically military facilities. The consensus seems to be that there is a good chance of success for the talks, but that they might exceed the deadline.

 Hard-liners in the West and in Iran remain mistrustful about the scope and implementation of the deal. Some critics in the West seem to think that the P5+1 negotiators will be tricked by Iran, and will “give away the store” to get a deal. This is probably not a very realistic scenario, but makes good fodder for domestic consumption. While there will probably be an “imperfect” deal, with each side not getting everything it wants, the overall good for all concerned of getting a deal that prevents militarization of Iran’s nuclear program and lifts sanctions, bringing Iran back into the mainstream of the international community should be obvious. What are your thoughts on this question? Please log in and let us know.

 

U.S. Sends 2nd Blunt Warning to China Within a Week

18178779681_455fa919d8_c.jpgU.S. Secretary of Defense Ash Carter in Hawaii ( SOD via flickr)

                             by David Parmer

For the second time in less than a week, a high U.S. government official has sent a blunt message to China about U.S. intentions in the Pacific. On May 27, at a change-of-command ceremony at Pearl Harbor, Hawaii,  U.S. Secretary of Defense Ash Carter echoed the same kind of tough talk that U.S. Vice President Joe Biden had engaged in less than a week earlier at the U.S. Naval Academy.

 Carter’s speech echoed Biden’s in that he addressed the occasion at hand, congratulated the admirals involved, talked of their service and achievements, and then gave the same message/warning to China that Biden had done. He said that the U.S wants peaceful resolution to all disputes, but that it would not budge on what it considers its rights in international waters.

 First, we want a peaceful resolution of all disputes, and an immediate and lasting halt to land reclamation by any claimant. We also oppose any further militarization of disputed features.

Second – and there should be no mistake, should be no mistake about this – the United States will fly, sail, and operate wherever international law allows, as we do all around the world.

Finally, with its actions in the South China Sea, China is out of step with both international norms that underscore the Asia-Pacific’s security architecture, and the regional consensus in favor of a non-coercive approach to this and other long-standing disputes.

China’s actions are bringing countries in the region together in new ways. And they’re increasing demand for American engagement in the Asia-Pacific, and we’re going to meet it. We will remain the principal security power in the Asia-Pacific for decades to come.

 To underscore the points he outlined in Hawaii, Secretary of Defense Carter repeated them and elaborated on the theme in his speech at the IISS Shangra La Dialogue in Singapore on May 30. One might ask why the Obama administration is having two of its highest level officials delivering the same message. One reason might simply be to clearly state U.S. resolve to the American people, and to U.S. allies in the Pacific region. The other is to show U.S. resolve to a rising China, and put China on notice that the U.S. is still very much a world power and player in the Pacific. A final reason that can always be considered is domestic politics. A strong policy in the Pacific and a tough stance toward China might pre-empt any attempt by Republicans to paint the Democrats as “weak” on China in the coming presidential election.

 Secretary Ash Carter’s Hawaii Speech May 27, 2015

http://www.defense.gov/Speeches/Speech.aspx?SpeechID=1944

Secretary  Ash Carter’s Singapore Speech May 30, 2015

https://www.iiss.org/-/media/Documents/Events/Shangri-La%20Dialogue/SLD15/Carter.pdf

Chinese Response to Carter at Annapolis

http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2015-05/29/c_134282034.htm

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Joe Biden Lays Out Tough US Policy at Annapolis

 

                                     by David Parmer

The U.S. Vice President’s speech at the U.S. Naval Academy graduation on May 22 was pure Biden. The Vice President engaged his audience as only a seasoned politician can do. In just over 25 minutes he made remarks appropriate to the occasion, acknowledged dignitaries and treated all to samples of the Biden wit and humor. That’s not to say that the speech lacked gravitas; he praised the hard work of the graduates and wished them well in their chosen careers in the U.S. Navy or U.S. Marine Corps, and explained how much the country needs them. It was a fine commencement speech indeed.

However, what could easily be overlooked with the emphasis on humor and ceremony was the tough policy speech that was wrapped in that framework. Mr. Biden laid out U.S. foreign policy clearly and bluntly. He explained that the U.S. was not only a world power, but a Pacific power, and that the U.S. had been active in the Pacific for the past 60 years and would continue to be so. He pointed the finger at China for its actions in the South China Sea, and criticized China’s unilateral policy in the area. And in a strong statement, after enumerating U.S. naval power, he said “…woe betide the foe who decides to challenge the United States of America or our Navy.” And to further make his point he said: “America’s command of the oceans is the measure and the symbol of our diplomatic and military primacy in the world.”

In 1900, U.S. President Teddy Roosevelt wrote: “Speak softly and carry a big stick; you will go far.” Roosevelt’s America had a strong navy and was not afraid to use it. It seems as if on May 22, Vice President Biden was channeling the spirit of Teddy Roosevelt to a receptive audience of sailors and marines.

Just down the road is the U.S. presidential election in 2016. Mr. Biden has not ruled out seeking the nomination. And, Mr. Biden’s speech at the U.S. Naval Academy did not seem Vice Presidential, but rather more Presidential. He laid out a bold vision of American power in this century and beyond. Perhaps Joe Biden is not ready to sail off into the sunset just yet. Judged by his Annapolis speech, it would seem that that is the case.

 

 Excerpts from Vice President Biden’s Speech at Annapolis on May 22, 2015

U.S. foreign policy is rebalancing toward the vast potential of the Asia Pacific region. But we can’t succeed if you don’t show up. That’s why 60 percent of the United States Naval forces will be stationed in the Asia Pacific by 2020 — P-8s, Zumwalt-class destroyers, littoral combat ships, forward-deployed forces, Marines in Darwin — all and many more are headed to the Pacific, and so are many of you. And it matters — because Pacific peace and prosperity, to a great extent, has depended on and will continue to depend on U.S. Naval power, just as it has for the past 60 years.

In the disputed waters of the South China Sea, the United States does not privilege the claims of one nation over another. But we do — unapologetically — stand up for the equitable and peaceful resolution of disputes and for the freedom of navigation.

And today, these principles are being tested by Chinese activities in the South China Sea. They’re building airstrips –the placing of oil rigs, the imposition of unilateral bans on fishing in disputed territories, the declaration of air-defense zones, the reclamation of land, which other countries are doing, but not nearly on the massive scale the Chinese are doing.

We will look to you to guarantee our strategic nuclear deterrence serving in Navy ballistic missile submarines, the most secure and survivable element of our nuclear triad. From the offensive firepower of the Marine Expeditionary Force to our Carrier strike forces to our multi-nation ballistic missile defense capable ships [sic], woe betide the foe who decides to challenge the United States of America or our Navy.

America’s command of the oceans is the measure and the symbol of our diplomatic and military primacy in the world. As George Washington remarked during the Revolutionary War, “It follows then as certain as that night succeeds day that without a decisive naval force we can do nothing definitive. And with it, everything honorable and glorious.” That hasn’t changed one single bit.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2015/05/22/commencement-address-vice-president-united-states-naval-academy

Photo: U.S. Naval Academy (public domain) via flickr

 

 

 

 

“Summer Davos” in Dalian, China Sept. 9-11, 2015


17246013898_39be214829_z.jpg                                   (Photo: WEF 2015 Mexico)

The 9th Annual Meeting of the New Champions – Global Meeting on Innovation, Science and Technology will take place in Dalian this coming September. Known as the “Summer Davos” the meeting will host more than 1500 participants  from 90 countries representing such areas business, government research and media. This year’s theme will be “Charting a new Course for Growth.” The meeting will bring together :

  • Tech pioneers
  • Public figures
  • Young global leaders
  • Social entrepreneurs

In this year’s meeting, these leaders and thinkers will examine the entrepreneurial response to the question of lower growth since the world financial crisis.

For a complete description visit the Annual Meeting of the New Champions website:

http://www.weforum.org/events/annual-meeting-new-champions-2015

 

 

AIIB Update – The Ship Has Sailed

Daily Coin.jpg

                                           (Photo: Daily Coin)

March 31, 2015 was the closing day for countries to apply to be founding members of the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank. The U.S. and Japan were not on board. Fifty-seven other nations including some staunch U.S. allies were on board. It was reported that the Chinese themselves were surprised by the interest in the project. There is a huge demand for capital for infrastructure in Asia, and the World Bank and Asian Development Bank have not kept up with this demand in terms of loans, so China stepped in to fill the gap, and now there is the AIIB. Work is underway to create the launch of the new bank this year and discussions on the charter and the hiring of competent specialists to fill the many posts available are ongoing. Japan and the U.S. are the only two major world powers who have not joined the AIIB as founding members. So, what will happen in the near future?  Will Japan look out for its own interests and join the bank, or will Japan stand by its American allay and refuse to join? What do you think? Please log in and give us your thoughts on this matter.

 

 

Kazakhstan at the Crossroads of the 21st Century

                            n1.si.jpgNursultan Nazarbayev, President of the Republic of Kazakhstan (Photo: RIA Novosty)

                            by David Parmer

If all goes well, the beginning of the 21st century will be remembered as the beginning of the rise of Kazakhstan to world power. Kazakhstan could easily become another Singapore; it has many of the same elements that worked in favor of making that country a world-class success including an extremely favorable location, political stability and a multi-ethnic society.

 And now, history seems to favor this Central Asian country. China has proposed a New Silk Road and has allocated funds for its promotion. New rail traffic will flow through Kazakhstan making it the crossroads of the resurgence of the region.

Moreover, where Singapore is blessed by its location, Kazakhstan, in addition to location, is blessed with petrochemical and mineral wealth.  The world’s ninth largest country is also blessed with abundant nature. It has rivers, mountains  and plains of breathtaking beauty that are an incredible asset for its tourism industry.  Kazakhstan will host Expo 2017 with the theme “Future Energy” and welcome visitors from around the world. As for political stability, Kazakhstan’s President, Nursultan Nazarbayev has just been re-elected for a fifth term, so politically one can expect “business as usual.”

almaty-oblast-kazakhstan-beauty-1.jpg

                         Almaty Oblast Kazakhstan (aboutkazakhstan.com)

 

The plus side of the equation looks pretty good, but what about the minus side? There are several issues that confront Kazakhstan in this century.

The  U. S. government lists some of them as:

  • National identity
  • Islamic revival
  • Expanding resources and exporting
  • Political and social reform

 Of these, perhaps the first two are the most salient. The country has a slightly higher percentage of Kazaks to Russians, the two main ethnic groups in the country.

The challenges for the 21st century are avoiding the dangers of Russian nationalism and separatism and Islamic extremism. Kazakhstan has only been independent since 1991, a very short time on the calendar of history. Can the people of Kazakhstan forge a national identity that supersedes ethnic and religious differences?

With a strong national identity, Kazakhstan can withstand the give and take of national politics and remain united, and at the same time enjoy its good fortune in terms of resources and geographical location. Kazakhstan is indeed at a crossroads, and time will tell which road it takes into this century and beyond.

astana.jpg                                    Astana, Kazakhstan by Night ( Photo: aboutkazakhstan.com)

 

 

Kim to Stay Home and Miss Russian WWII Celebration.

Kim_JOng-Un_2942995b.jpg                                                

                                     by David Parmer / Tokyo

The New York Times reported on April 30, that the DPRK Leader Kim Jong-un will not attend Russian celebrations to mark the victory over Nazi Germany on May 9. Mr. Kim hasn’t travelled abroad since taking power after his father’s death. The question is why will he sit this one out? One thing that comes to mind is that he fears internal disorder in his absence, or even a coup d’état. There could be a million different reasons for his not going to Moscow. What do you think might be a good one? Please log in and give us your thoughts on this latest mystery surrounding the man of mystery.

 

What is Mr. Xi Thinking? In Which Direction is China Heading?

Xi Book Cover.jpg

    Xi Jinping The Governance of China (Photo: english.cri.cn)

                           by David Parmer

The  unambiguous answer to the above questions can be found in Mr. Xi’s book, The Governance of China. Released in September 2014, the book’s 18 chapters contain speeches, interviews and correspondence by China’s president, who also holds the posts of General Secretary of the CCP and Chairman of the Central Military Commission.

 Since the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, China has headed in a new direction in Reform and Opening Up. President Xi tells us what he is thinking and where he is going in light of these developments.

Topics covered by Mr. Xi include:

  • Socialism with Chinese Characteristics
  • The Chinese Dream
  • All-round and Deeper-level Reform
  • Economic Development
  • Rule of Law
  • Culturally Advanced China
  • Social Undertakings
  • Ecological Progress
  • National Defense
  • “One Country, Two Systems”
  • Peaceful Development
  • New Model of Major-Country Relations
  • Neighborhood Diplomacy
  • Cooperation with Developing Countries
  • Multilateral Relations
  • Close Ties with the People
  • Combat Corruption
  • The CPC Leadership

The immense value of Mr. Xi’s book is that he spells out the Chinese position in a succinct and easily-understandable manner. Pick a topic and you will find China’s position and Mr. Xi’s thinking stated clearly:

 On Taiwan:

 “…the most important and most fundamental thing to do is to maintain China’s sovereignty and territorial integrity. Although the mainland and Taiwan are yet to be reunited, they belong to one and the same China which is an indivisible whole.” (Handle Cross-Straits Relations in the Overall Interests of the Chinese Nation)

 On The Chinese Dream:

“In my opinion, achieving the rejuvenation of the Chinese nation has been the greatest dream of the Chinese people since the advent of modern times.” (Achieving Rejuvenation Is the Dream of the Chinese People)

On the Environment:

 “Our Party raised a requirement to build a beautiful China at its 18th National Congress. The whole of society should enhance its ecological awareness and strengthen environmental protection in accordance with this requirement so as to build China into a country with a good environment.” ( A Better Environment for a Beautiful China)

On the Military:

 Our officers and soldiers will maintain an indomitable revolutionary sprit and be dauntless in combat. We will make every effort to combat corruption and promote integrity in the armed forces. Senior officers must take a clear-cut stand against corruption and set an example in abiding by the code of honest conduct.” (Build up Our National Defense and Armed Forces)

 Those interested in understanding China in the 21st century will find The Governance of China a readable and easily-understandable roadmap. One may agree or disagree with the direction  in which China is heading, but one can not claim ignorance when it is all there in Xi Jinping’s book, The Governance of China.